<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prez</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thornock.org/2008/01/prez/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thornock.org/2008/01/prez/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 04:42:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: G-man</title>
		<link>http://www.thornock.org/2008/01/prez/comment-page-1/#comment-14879</link>
		<dc:creator>G-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thornock.org/2008/01/prez/#comment-14879</guid>
		<description>That was such a great analysis. I appreciated his very brief political history of our church, which despite what our members think, is a very different church than in Joseph Smith’s day. Indeed Brigham Young would find us an unruly, greedy, immoral lot and we would find him a raving, mad, dictator. 

I enjoyed how he pointed out that secrecy paid dividends in avoiding the persecution of the government. But now that secrecy has caused us some discomfort and possibly, dare I say, the abandonment of some of the original teachings of the church. “Mormon teaching has moved away from many of Smith’s more radical ideas.”

There are so many great questions that arise from this odd political situation. 

If conservatives cannot accept a Mormon president, especially considering how often conservatives tout the Constitution and its ban on a religious test for public office; what do Conservatives really stand for? My guess is that conservatism is fractured as badly as liberalism. Each group within conservatism and liberalism being held by a golden thread to their respective parties. Remember, there are only two parties representing thousands of ideals.  

Now that a Mormon has the ability to run for President, the question must be asked; was it worth it for the Mormon people?  Did our desire for mainstream acceptance cost us our religion? What shall we do, if anything?

Please understand, I will probably not vote for Romney, but I have enjoyed the questions that his presidential bid has forced into the open, and your post. It is nice to see you posting this kind of stuff again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was such a great analysis. I appreciated his very brief political history of our church, which despite what our members think, is a very different church than in Joseph Smith’s day. Indeed Brigham Young would find us an unruly, greedy, immoral lot and we would find him a raving, mad, dictator. </p>
<p>I enjoyed how he pointed out that secrecy paid dividends in avoiding the persecution of the government. But now that secrecy has caused us some discomfort and possibly, dare I say, the abandonment of some of the original teachings of the church. “Mormon teaching has moved away from many of Smith’s more radical ideas.”</p>
<p>There are so many great questions that arise from this odd political situation. </p>
<p>If conservatives cannot accept a Mormon president, especially considering how often conservatives tout the Constitution and its ban on a religious test for public office; what do Conservatives really stand for? My guess is that conservatism is fractured as badly as liberalism. Each group within conservatism and liberalism being held by a golden thread to their respective parties. Remember, there are only two parties representing thousands of ideals.  </p>
<p>Now that a Mormon has the ability to run for President, the question must be asked; was it worth it for the Mormon people?  Did our desire for mainstream acceptance cost us our religion? What shall we do, if anything?</p>
<p>Please understand, I will probably not vote for Romney, but I have enjoyed the questions that his presidential bid has forced into the open, and your post. It is nice to see you posting this kind of stuff again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.thornock.org/2008/01/prez/comment-page-1/#comment-14781</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thornock.org/2008/01/prez/#comment-14781</guid>
		<description>Interesting article.  This could be an election for the history books- first female pres, first black pres, or first mormon pres.  Why don&#039;t we just elect Gladys Knight and kill three birds with one stone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article.  This could be an election for the history books- first female pres, first black pres, or first mormon pres.  Why don&#8217;t we just elect Gladys Knight and kill three birds with one stone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maran</title>
		<link>http://www.thornock.org/2008/01/prez/comment-page-1/#comment-14478</link>
		<dc:creator>Maran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thornock.org/2008/01/prez/#comment-14478</guid>
		<description>I agree with you as well. I feel like I am more interested in this presidential race than I have ever been before, though, because he is running. I am interested to see what people say to him and about him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you as well. I feel like I am more interested in this presidential race than I have ever been before, though, because he is running. I am interested to see what people say to him and about him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big jake</title>
		<link>http://www.thornock.org/2008/01/prez/comment-page-1/#comment-14456</link>
		<dc:creator>big jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 07:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thornock.org/2008/01/prez/#comment-14456</guid>
		<description>I agree on those thoughts my brother.  There is one thing that bothers me most.  Many of my faith followers are voting for him solely because he is Mormon.  To each there own but, how are we going to end up with a decent president in this not so necessary antiquated political voting system if 5 million voters waste their ballot on somone who may not get enough electorial votes anyways.  If he has a good to honest chance I will cast a vote in his favor but, the choice must be made to choose the best fool who ends up on the ballot.  Either way he has done some good paving far better than a bread crumb trail anyday.  Good things have come from his exposure or non exposure to coruption.  Darn good founders speach also for the history books.   May those &quot;dodgy&quot; questions be asked and may those sweating learn to trust the spirit and keep the faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on those thoughts my brother.  There is one thing that bothers me most.  Many of my faith followers are voting for him solely because he is Mormon.  To each there own but, how are we going to end up with a decent president in this not so necessary antiquated political voting system if 5 million voters waste their ballot on somone who may not get enough electorial votes anyways.  If he has a good to honest chance I will cast a vote in his favor but, the choice must be made to choose the best fool who ends up on the ballot.  Either way he has done some good paving far better than a bread crumb trail anyday.  Good things have come from his exposure or non exposure to coruption.  Darn good founders speach also for the history books.   May those &#8220;dodgy&#8221; questions be asked and may those sweating learn to trust the spirit and keep the faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
